Why presume the worst? My impression is that they've run the site very well. It's hard to ask for a model who's been as interactive and, aside from a few blips, the webmaster has provided regular, quality content.
Not presuming, stating fact. Also, he doesn't "run the site very well". I gave him my money a long time ago, back when his sites had two updates per week. Later he nixed the second update per week and made it two updates every few weeks or so, then only one update per week, then sometimes no updates for a week or more at a time and then later on an "apology", then he decided to start removing old sets forever so that you literally cannot get these sets without pirating them now because he's such a retard when it comes to operating his business. This was done all with the same membership price being constant with quality and respect for the people lining his pockets being taken for granted. The webmaster is a piece of shit. He got my money in the past, but never again. I'd gladly support these girls on different websites or if they went solo on a cam site, but that webmaster can fuck off for all I care.
Secondly, Alex has had no problems whatsoever posting candids and blog updates in the past, so why can't she now that she's 18? Because the webmaster is a schmuck and isn't allowing her to. Thus he continues this charade because he has no concept of time or scheduling and now feels he has to burn through the old -18 sets at the same snail's pace, once a week (or maybe once every two weeks if he has another convenient "problem"). He easily could post some 18+ candids, even one or two at a time like Amanda did, in the meantime. I mean, for Christ's sake, this same guy fucks up his scheduling routinely and then has his models shoot their own sets with their phones as a means to provide something when he doesn't have anything to post for his paying members.
As soon as the first 18+ pic hits the site, whether it's a studio shoot or a candid, the webmaster becomes legally obliged to have the 2257 information available for inspection, by any person on the entire damn planet who requests it, for every single picture and video on the site going back to the beginning, under pain of a large federal fine for every single incident where he can't come up with the documentation. I doubt that he bothered to do all of that tedious paperwork for an under-18 NN site years before the model's majority - why would he? he didn't need it to run the site, and it wastes time and money - so he'd be screwed the very first time some bored anti-porn crusader crank in the middle of nowhere made a formal request he couldn't satisfy. He also might even lose his billing company if he mixed under-18 and 18+ content on his site, depending on their policies and his contract with them, as a lot of them have a blanket ban on such sites. Why the fuck would he risk that for a couple of teaser pics? If there are going to be any early samples, look for them on twitter or similar social media, the website isn't going near them without great big censor bars on the photos that show not a damn thing. It's not his fault we have some badly written laws on the books, but that's the world he's got to do business in.
Now see, this is just wrong. This isn't his first rodeo. He's had -18 models transition to 18+ content numerous times, most even on the same website (Amanda, Kris, Brooke, Sheri, Kelsey, Danni, off the top of my head). He's not "risking" anything, he's just inept. If in fact 2257 is gumming up the works then he could have handled this long ago, but he didn't and has not because he's a piece of shit.
Stop enabling perennial fuck-ups by defending them on here. Unless he's giving you free memberships or handjobs under the table as a means of thanks then you're just wasting your time defending him on here. You're not convincing anyone otherwise when reality conflicts with the fantasy you're trying to purvey.