That's the part everybody seems to leave out of this discussion. They did NOT condone it. They turned her cam off while she was live and wouldn't turn it back on till she took the flag down. So she did and they turned it back on.The only reason she was allowed to do that was because she rakes in the cash for MFC
The nun shows push the limits also. Funny how not hardly anyone said anything about those shows.The same goes for when she did the terrorist show.
Is there a cap of this?having a junkie try and steal their laptop live on cam
That's not how freedom of speech works (in the US at least). MFC is a private company so they can make up any rules they want (with some exceptions, they probably legally can't broadcast say...snuff films). Doesn't mean all their rules are good ones, but they have the right.I find MFCs view of this appalling whatever happened to freedom of speech and expression. I must say I am personally not a fan and find what she did in extremely bad taste. However that was her choice and mfc do not have the right to sensor anyone even if they don't agree with it. Plus banning the other model shows what a massive inconsistancy between those that earn and those that don't
However it does not contradict their rules as I have posted in another thread. The rules for models are quite clearThat's not how freedom of speech works (in the US at least). MFC is a private company so they can make up any rules they want (with some exceptions, they probably legally can't broadcast say...snuff films). Doesn't mean all their rules are good ones, but they have the right.
I never condoned it to be fair. In life I have learnt the more attention you give to morons like her the more moronic they get. She did it to get a reaction and it workedsometimes common sense is just assumed. In some cases, like with Olivia and her little fanboys, it just needs to spelled out a little more clearly.
that freedom is ONLY from govt. prosecution, not getting fired, punched in the face...etc.whatever happened to freedom of speech and expression.
prime example of camgirl thinking. protesting something using an entity w/the same basic principles. she shouldnt lose respect for camming, but for being a complete moron.some random girl that I've never heard of, decided she would do a "protest" by wearing a hood and calling herself the KayKayKay.
the scarier part is that thats the logic they use when they elect ppl to office. if they like them, they dont even have to know/understand their principles or ideas, the candidate could stab babies and would still get their vote, or in this case, tokens.it's more proof that too many at MFC are too easily entertained.
MFC is paying the bills, they get to decide what gets shown and what dont. none of those, all of those, or any combination of those mentioned. and anything else not mentioned, its their show.I'd like to ask the people that were throwing a fit on twitter last night (or you) if they would like it if MFC started to ban all the models that have a rainbow flag up? An ISIS flag? A Black Panther flag? A BlackLivesMatter sign? A Confederate Flag? What if they say no more girl/girl shows or you get fired?
see above commentand mfc do not have the right to sensor anyone even if they don't agree with it.
they should have done it in St. Louis. they could have gotten the extra bonus of being shot 1st.crazysysy and arayah camming together and walking down the street with their laptop and having a junkie try and steal their laptop live on cam
I know and totally agree that it is their choice as to what is and isn't broadcast on their site. I'm just saying that it shouldn't be dictated by popular demand or some PC bs. That's my point.MFC is paying the bills, they get to decide what gets shown and what dont
I haven't seen one. This was around 2009-2010 before the 24/7 capping of public rooms happened and they only capped actual cum shows.Is there a cap of this?
Very well said, man.That's the part everybody seems to leave out of this discussion. They did NOT condone it. They turned her cam off while she was live and wouldn't turn it back on till she took the flag down. So she did and they turned it back on.
The nun shows push the limits also. Funny how not hardly anyone said anything about those shows.
But I agree, they should not have fired the other girl for doing her crazy costume. They shouldn't be firing/banning any of them for simply dressing a certain way or having a flag up behind them. Where or who decides what is offensive? I'd like to ask the people that were throwing a fit on twitter last night (or you) if they would like it if MFC started to ban all the models that have a rainbow flag up? An ISIS flag? A Black Panther flag? A BlackLivesMatter sign? A Confederate Flag? What if they say no more girl/girl shows or you get fired?
Different people find different things offensive. Should they cater to only the people that find the Nazi flag offensive? It's a slippery slope when a site/company starts to censor what people want to do with their own free will to earn some money in the free market.
I think there is a simple solution to it. If a member doesn't like what a model is doing in her room, don't go in there. It's kind of like TV. There are shows that I find disgusting and can't stand. Rather than get on social media and cry about having my feelings hurt, I just don't watch it. To each their own, I'm not the one that's gonna judge them when they leave this world. That's on them.
i actually have that movie...lol and about 15 more. i like chaplin.her "speech" at her saturday show reminded me on the movie "The-great-dictator (1940)".